Printed fromChabadNewOrleans.com
ב"ה

ChabadNewOrleans Blog

America: Good for Judaism or Not?

My great-grandfather, R’ Yochanan Gordon, had brothers in the USA in the early 1930s. They sought to bring him from Eastern Europe to give him the chance to raise his family in greater safety. He was terrified of the spiritual ramifications of that decision on his children’s future. After receiving assurances from his Rebbe that his children would merit to be chassidim who study in Chabad Yeshivas in America, he took the plunge. At first, he came alone, and then after working for several years, he was able to bring the rest of his family. Ultimately the Rebbe’s blessing materialized and my grandfather and his siblings were among the early students of the Chabad Yeshiva that opened in 1940.

Why was he so scared? Why was America considered a “treife Medinah” – a “non-Kosher” land? Why were the waters of the New York Harbor (allegedly) filled with pairs of Tefillin that were tossed overboard when the Jews arriving felt that they would not be needed in America?

To some extent the freedoms afforded in the USA created an environment in which highest priority was given to material accomplishment. People worked very hard to achieve some measure of financial stability, and ultimately, success. Shabbos and daily prayers were often the first casualties in the effort to keep a job. Jewish education was relegated to after-school Talmud Torahs so that kids could become real Americans in Public School. Furthermore, when there is no state-sponsored antisemitism, the urgency to cling to traditions didn’t seem as acute.

Contrast this approach with that of the Previous Lubavitcher Rebbe, who upon his arrival in 1940 declared, “America is no different.” Judaism could thrive here as much as in Europe. In fact, the freedoms in America could enable Judaism to thrive even more. He was so enamored with the freedoms and values of the USA, that he wore Shabbos clothes and his fur hat (spodik) on the day that he took the oath of US citizenship.

What did he see in America that was so encouraging? What were the values that had so much potential for religious flourishing, which he embraced?

I have been thinking about this question in preparation for the upcoming course that starts next week, Sinai and Civics – The Jewish Ethics That Shaped America’s Founding. As I thought about it more, I have concluded that the values upon which the United States was founded most closely reflect the values of the Torah. This is true about the US more than any other country in modern times, including the State of Israel.

This does not assume that the values were implemented to the extent necessary right away. Certainly, there was, and there still is, much room for improvement in reaching the ideals and values espoused by the founders, even as they themselves didn’t live up to them in a complete manner.

Were you aware that both Franklin and Jefferson argued for Exodus imagery on the US national seal? The Torah and the Jewish story were ever present in the minds and articulated ideas of the founders and those the preceded them to the New World.

Is America perfect? Of course not. No human-made society can be perfect. It’s not even the best America it can be. Our society is a work in progress. But the relationship between Judaism and the founding values of this country are fascinating. This should make us prouder to be Jewish and to live Jewishly.

I hope you will join us at one of the two options for taking this 4-part course starting next week. Tuesdays at noon at Egenberg Trial Lawyers. Wednesdays at 7 pm at Chabad Uptown. For more info and to register, www.chabadneworleans.com/jli.

Shabbat Shalom
Rabbi Mendel Rivkin

Is Kvetching a Jewish Value?

A favorite Jewish t-shirt slogan reads “Born to Kvetch.” A book was written in 2005 by the same title. Is kvetching really a Jewish value? Like with most things, it depends on context. I would like to use an incident from this week’s Parsha to demonstrate that kvetching about someone else getting more than you is most certainly (to be read “soy-ten-ly”) not a Jewish value.

In the first chapter of Bamidbar (Numbers), G-d instructs Moses to appoint a tribal leader (Nassi) for each of the twelve tribes, to assist with the census and the administration of their tribe. They are then identified by name. The Nassi of the tribe of Gad is Eliasaf ben De’uel.

In chapter two the Torah describes the layout of the Israelite encampment as they traveled through the Sinai Desert. The twelve tribes were divided into four camps of three tribes. Each of the four camps was led by one of the tribes. Here again the names of the twelve tribal leaders are mentioned. However, here the name of the Nassi of Gad is presented as Eliasaf ben Re’uel.

Several commentators address this discrepancy. The 18th century sage, Chida (Rabbi Chaim Y.D. Azulai) bases his explanation on a teaching in another work, Noam Megadim, addressing the question of why the tribe of Gad merited to have Moses interred in their portion of Eretz Yisrael on the East Bank of the Jordan River.

He explains that when Moshe divided the camps of Israel into four groups of three tribes, he placed the tribe of Gad under the “Flag of Leadership” of the tribe of Dan. Now the tribe of Gad could have had a legitimate cause to kvetch about that placement. Just as Dan was a firstborn to his mother, Bilhah, Gad was a firstborn to his mother, Zilpah. So why should Gad have to play second fiddle to Dan? Yet, the tribe of Gad, under the leadership of their Nassi, Eliasaf, opted to accept their placement without complaint, thereby saving Moshe the trouble of having to defend the decision. For this they merited to have Moshe buried in their portion.

Chida explains, the word Re’uel means beloved of G-d, a reference to Moshe. This is why the name of Eliasaf’s father is changed to Re’uel when describing the encampment. For that was the context in which Gad was acquiescent to Moshe’s leadership. The decision not to kvetch gave them the privilege of proximity to Moshe, the beloved of G-d.

So, the next time your kid kvetches that his sister got a larger slice of cake… tell ‘em that kvetching is not a Jewish value. While we may have been “born to kvetch,” at some point you have to grow up.

Shabbat Shalom
Rabbi Mendel Rivkin

Maybe Hashem Wants Something Different

Earlier this week, my son Eliyahu experienced a biking mishap resulting in a broken wrist. It is tough to see your child in pain and wait with them in the emergency room for some relief. He is not my first kid to get fit with a cast. What made this unique is that he is three weeks away from his Bar Mitzvah. After ascertaining that he was going to be ok, my first thought was, “poor kid, his first opportunity to fulfill the Mitzvah of tefillin will be compromised by the cast on his left arm, which prevents him from properly winding the straps directly on his arm.”

Thinking about it a little more I recalled a story that changed my mindset. Two of the early Chassidic masters, the brothers, Reb Zushe and Reb Elimelech, spent time traveling incognito for a particular mission. During their travels, the “socially conscious” Russian police arrested them in middle of the night for “loitering.” They were thrown into a large cell that held many inmates, mostly drunk Russian peasants. In middle of the room was a chamber pot for the inmates’ use.

In the morning, Reb Zushe began to cry in despair. The presence of the filthy chamber pot in the room precluded them from being allowed to pray. He lamented the fact that it would be the first time in his adult life that he was unable to lay tefillin and pray. Reb Elimelech consoled him saying, “brother, the same G-d that commanded you to lay tefillin and pray each day, commanded you not to pray in the presence of filth. As a servant of G-d you simply have a different mission today.”

Reb Zushe was very inspired by his brother’s words, and he began to dance with joy at his newly discovered opportunity to serve Hashem. As the brothers danced, they were joined by the peasants who welcomed the distraction. Hearing noise emanating from the cell, the guard inquired as to what sparked the celebration. One of the peasants informed him that he wasn’t sure, but it had something to do with that bucket in middle of the room… crazy Jews… Hearing this, the guard tossed the chamber pot out of the room. Upon seeing what the guard did, Reb Elimelech chuckled to his brother and said, “nu brother, let’s go daven.”

Applying this to Eliyahu’s situation, we assumed that Hashem wanted to be served by Eliyahu wearing his tefillin in the “proper” way. It seems that Hashem wanted otherwise. Now, he will have the chance to serve Hashem in an unconventional manner, by winding the straps over his cast. Or maybe, Hashem has a trick up “His sleeve” and when we go for the follow up appointment before the Bar Mitzvah, the cast will be replaced by something removable or will no longer be needed altogether. Either way, Eliyahu will “report for duty” that morning, and whatever orders the Commander-In-Chief has for him that day will be carried out joyfully.

Shabbat Shalom
Rabbi Mendel Rivkin

Count, Recount, and Make Each Day Count

A man of Polish extraction calls his lawyer and says, “I think my wife is planning to kill me.” The lawyer replies, “What gave you that idea.” The man explains, “I caught a glimpse of her shopping list and one of the items was Polish Remover.”

The English language can be quite complicated because of all the homographs (Polish vs. polish), homonyms (rose vs. rose), and homophones (cell vs. sell). This due in large part to the fact that English evolved from multiple languages. Abbot and Costello had a field day with this.

Hebrew (more specifically – the Holy Tongue), on the other hand, has another issue, in which words can have multiple layers of meaning. This can be traced to the concept of root letters. Take for example the word Sefirah. There are many connotations to the word. It is a Kabbalistic concept – one of the Sefirahs (Sefirot) – Divine and human attributes, specifically related to character. It is a period on the Jewish calendar (Sefirat Haomer). It means a numeric count (related to the verb of counting numbers). When we drill down to the root letters (Samech, Fei, and Reish) we can find a relation to Sipur, to relate or recount a story. Finally, we can also draw a connection to Sapir, a luminous shining gem, Saphire.

According to Chassidus, when there are multiple applications of meaning to a word or concept in Torah, there must also be a connection between them. So, let’s explore this further.

We are now in the time of counting the omer (Sefirah). This 49-day period began on the second night of Passover and ends on the day before Shavuot. During these 49 days we count each day in anticipation of receiving the Torah on day 50. Each of these days is also associated with a particular Sefirah (attribute of character) that we are meant to refine in preparation for receiving the Torah. Human character is comprised of seven dimensions. Each of the seven has seven shades, by way of integration with the others, so, 7 x 7 equals 49. As we go through the process of refinement of our 49 shades of character (Sefirah), we count each day and make each day count (Sefirah); we thereby rewrite our own life’s story and recount it anew (Sipur), and our life and character become as shiny and luminous as a Saphire (Sapir).

May we all experience a successful journey of counting, recounting, and making each day count with shining luminescence.

Shabbat Shalom
Rabbi Mendel Rivkin

Looking for older posts? See the sidebar for the Archive.